One of the ways the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Safety Measurement System (SMS) accounts for differences in carrier operations is by segmenting
carriers by whether their company operates primarily Straight vehicles or Combination vehicles.
Currently, this segmentation only applies when calculating percentiles for the Unsafe Driving
and Crash Indicator safety categories. FMCSA decided to explore whether extending
segmentation to the rest of the safety categories would provide better carrier-to-carrier
comparisons and improve the methodology’s ability to identify carriers with high crash rates for interventions.
Proposal
The proposed methodology would extend Straight and Combination segmentation to the Driver Fitness safety category in addition to retaining segmentation in the Unsafe Driving and Crash Indicator safety categories. The table below provides the SMS’ criteria for Straight and Combination carriers, which would carry over to the proposed methodology.
Straight and Combination Carrier Criteria
Extending segmentation to Driver Fitness would ensure motor carriers are treated fairly by
comparing them to other carriers with similar operations and patterns of violations.
Analysis Method
The FMCSA explored extending Straight and Combination segmentation to the HOS Compliance, Vehicle Maintenance: Driver Observed, Vehicle Maintenance, and Driver Fitness safety categories by following the process below. Segmentation was applied after establishing the violation severity weights.
Apply Straight and Combination segmentation for each safety category above.
Compare violation rates among Straight and Combination carriers in each safety category to determine whether segmentation is justified.
Run ET to assess the impact on crash rates of carriers prioritized and number of Straight and Combination carriers prioritized.
Evaluation Results
The FMCSA’s analysis shows that Straight and Combination segmentation would improve the effectiveness of the Driver Fitness safety category. There are large differences in the violation rates of Combination and Straight carriers in Driver Fitness. As shown in the below table, the violation rates of Straight carriers are nearly four times as high as Combination carriers. Based on these results, segmentation is justified to ensure carriers are compared to others with similar operations and violation rates.
Driver Fitness Violation Rates for Straight and Combination Carriers
Applying segmentation to the Driver Fitness safety category would identify prioritized carriers with higher crash rates in both the Straight and Combination segments. While it does decrease the number of carriers prioritized in the Driver Fitness, the carriers that are removed have a lower crash rate, which would sharpen the focus on carriers at higher risk for crashes.
Carriers Prioritized in Driver Fitness With and Without Straight and Combination Segmentation
FMCSA also tested segmentation in the HOS Compliance, Vehicle Maintenance: Driver
Observed, and Vehicle Maintenance safety categories, but the addition of segmentation lowered the crash rate of prioritized carriers in these safety categories.
All information in this post was retrieved from the FMCSA New Prioritization Methodology: Foundational Document, Version 1.5, March 2022.
Make sure to check out our online DOT Training platform, DOT University! We currently are offering Reasonable Suspicion for Supervisors, Cargo Securement, Defensive Driving, and Pre/Post Trip Inspection. In the coming months, we plan on releasing Designated Employer Representative and Appendix A.
Until then, check out our other blogs or follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to be the first to know when new classes are made available or for other updates like this! You can also opt-in to our newsletter for exclusive offers, regulation changes, and industry news!
Stay Off The Radar!
Comments